Page 1 of 1

遏制核武器不如遏制政治家。 核武器的力量虽大,但其破坏力是一时的,虽然重建可能花费10-20年,但却是可以重建的。 而政治家的破坏力却是旷日持久的,而且是不可重建的,因为它们摧毁的是人们的信念和生活方式!

Posted: 2025-08-29T08:33:07+00:00
by expl
遏制核武器不如遏制政治家。
核武器的力量虽大,但其破坏力是一时的,虽然重建可能花费10-20年,但却是可以重建的。
而政治家的破坏力却是旷日持久的,而且是不可重建的,因为它们摧毁的是人们的信念和生活方式!

Re: 遏制核武器不如遏制政治家。 核武器的力量虽大,但其破坏力是一时的,虽然重建可能花费10-20年,但却是可以重建的。 而政治家的破坏力却是旷日持久的,而且是不可重建的,因为它们摧毁的是人们的信念和生活方式!

Posted: 2025-09-28T23:53:32+00:00
by expl
Containing nuclear weapons is less effective than containing politicians.

While nuclear weapons are powerful, their destructive power is temporary. While rebuilding may take 10–20 years, it is reversible.

Politicians, on the other hand, have a long-lasting destructive power that cannot be rebuilt, as they destroy people's beliefs and way of life!

Re: 遏制核武器不如遏制政治家。 核武器的力量虽大,但其破坏力是一时的,虽然重建可能花费10-20年,但却是可以重建的。 而政治家的破坏力却是旷日持久的,而且是不可重建的,因为它们摧毁的是人们的信念和生活方式!

Posted: 2025-09-29T00:04:54+00:00
by expl
For example:
Japan: Rebuilt well.
(Persia) Iran, North Korea, China: Destroyed by politics.
(Tsarist Russia) The Soviet Union: Although disintegrated, the current Russia is not much different from the Soviet Union. Politics dominated, so it was essentially destroyed as well.
Germany: After the defeat of the Nazis and the reunification of East and West Germany, a fundamental political overhaul allowed Germany to rebuild.